opinion pages and articles on the beauty of life: friendship, family, love, romance, marriage, parenting, etc...
Decadent Sex and Money
Published on August 10, 2007 By jesseledesma In Current Events
Homosexual rights are not as simple as just saying we are protecting the individual’s rights to be part of society. In the USA there is a big political movement that wants to skew civil life in their favor. In other words they want to be in charge of society.

Before the last congressional election in America I wrote about the state of California government debating a law that would require public school teachers to discuss the transsexual and homosexual lifestyle with children as young as 6. I see this as a strict violation of the right of the parent not have the morality that he and/or she wants to teach their children interfered with by any level of government.

In addition, as a student of human psychology I can see no reason to discuss with very young children the details of the transgender and homosexual lifestyle. However, people in the gay agenda want to cram their politics down our throats.

Personally I have no problem with what people do in the privacy of their homes. I take great offense in having some else try to force me to defend their political agenda, especially when that agenda has more to do with physical pleasure and money.

I am not asking for congress to let me drool while I look at a picture of Joan Jett or Angelina Jolie. In addition, I am not walking down the street drooling while I look at said pictures.

Personal pleasure is a personal issue. It should be something maintained in the home. Even in this so called sophisticated society, I do not see openly gay people walking the street, holding hands, looking lovingly into each others eyes, while they go to kiss each other, and eyes are very grateful for it. I make this point because the lack of such group of people in society means they are regulating their own behavior in public. Therefore, the idea that it is about gay individuals roaming in society free to be gay just does not seen genuine.

Therefore, in the question should gays be allowed to marry I say no. Marriage is a heterosexual invention. I thought gays hated heterosexuals. If you hate the mainstream, why do you want to be like it?

The dirty little secret is that gay marriages are about money. Gay partners want to be the spouse so they will have spousal inheritance rights in the event of a death. Well don’t you know that you can put anything in your will, such as I leave all my earthly possessions to my gay lover Jack Smith who resides at such address?

I personally am not in favor of the gay lifestyle. I do not believe that it is a born trait. I do think that it is all about decadent sex and not love. A week ago I drove to self-described lesbians who “left their husbands at home” (their lesbian lovers). Even though they said they were lesbians and I am about as ugly as you can get, you could cut the sexual tensions with the edge of piece of paper. I wonder if these self-described lesbians know that being attracted to both genders makes them bi-sexual.

In addition, I do think gay behavior is a mental illness. In psychology we divide illness in to two categories. One is neurosis, which is an emotional base illness. The other is psychosis, which is a loss of reality base illness. The old guy wearing a cape as he wonders down the street yelling he is Jesus Christ is an example of loss of reality. When it is obvious that you need a male and a female in a marriage in order for the species to continue the avoidance of this necessity to represents a loosing touch with a species reality.

If you take the left leaning Darwin approach to life, which is “survival of the fittest” homosexuals loose out. The only way the species can survive is by continued procreation. Gays cannot produce offspring. Therefore, they are nowhere fit to survive. What advantage can homosexuality have to the human species?

Now you cannot offer that gays are better nurturers. Out all the crazies I know, gays are the craziest. Not only are they neurotic-highly emotional-they are also confrontational, angry, and violent aggressive.

How do I see homosexuality and every other perversion of human sexuality, like cyber sex with a thing you really cannot identify in a chat room? Well, I look at it as I look at my life.

God prefers us to the devil and his demons. This brings about a lot of hate in the heart of Satan. Therefore, Satan is actively involved in doing everything to destroy us before we accept Jesus Christ as our Lord and savior.

In addition, sex is one of his most lethal weapons. It feels good; very very good. In our modern time of sexual liberation you can bop anyone you want without having to worry about guilt or other moral conflicts, like shame. Even if you are judged or feel judged you can overcome it because society has conditioned us to be selfish about being indulgent.

Moreover, the one that looses is you. I am a firm believer that you can do what you want. I have no interest in anyone’s sexual practices. When people try to brainwash me with their gay agenda when I know it is about having all the sex you want and spousal inheritance I look at them like the disingenuous fools they are.

Living a life blind to the reality of life is a sad way to live.

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Aug 10, 2007
Jews, blacks, and Catholics can all reproduce, though.

What advantage can sterile men have to the human species?

What advantage can barren women have to the human species?

Now we're getting somewhere.
on Aug 10, 2007
The person themself is not to be reviled, just the behavior.

Hilter just had extreme views, he was a nice guy really ..... I hope you dont seriously want to pursue that line of debate.

Not going there - the floor is yours ..... I'm speechless.
on Aug 10, 2007
It's stupid to hate someone for any reason. I won't hate someone for having sex with people of the same gender. I won't hate someone for having an abortion. That doesn't mean I can't hate abortion or the act of having sex with someone of your own gender.

Basically, there's only two reasons to hate someone - something they are, or something they're doing(or have done). If it's something they are, they can't help that and it isn't going to help me to hate them for it. If it's an action, then hate the action - the person behind it is still a person, and therefore should be loved.
on Aug 10, 2007
How in the world can you compare a homosexual to a Jew.

In addition, what part of following Darwining theory of survival of the fitest do you not understand. When gays want to justify their behavior they use science that appears to say they are born gay but does not.

By the theory of survial of the fitest, since there is no benefit to human kind from homosexuality then nature would not select for this behavioral trait. This is scientific reasoning not an expression of my personal views.

Not to mention I plaining said that I hate they way gays try to force their plotics down our throats. Show were I said I hate gays. i have to much to do to waste my time on them. I wrote the article because there is a very good chance that election 2008 may lead to a democratic white house and democratic congress, which to me spells very high taxes and a lot more social engeneering.

I think many of you are reading to much into what I write and not paying attention to what I am actually writting about in my blog.
on Aug 10, 2007
Excuse me guy I am the evidence for the psycholgical nature of the gays I know. I did not say I know all gays.
on Aug 10, 2007
So you admit you're gay?


LOL.

That's what I got from that comment as well.

Or he's so fugly he turns people gay. One or the other. Haha.
on Aug 10, 2007
That might explain the underlying tone of self-loathing I've noticed in your blog.


Ah, that makes sense now. He's trying to disguise his own homosexual tendencies beneath a veneer of homophobia.
on Aug 10, 2007

In addition, what part of following Darwining theory of survival of the fitest do you not understand.


Humanity is the species that doesn't follow Darwin's law. It's pretty obvious we don't - obviously incompetent and inadequate members of the species breed and produce inadequate and incompetent children. It's just the way humans roll.

I do not see openly gay people walking the street, holding hands, looking lovingly into each others eyes, while they go to kiss each other, and eyes are very grateful for it. I make this point because the lack of such group of people in society means they are regulating their own behavior in public. Therefore, the idea that it is about gay individuals roaming in society free to be gay just does not seen genuine.


I suggest you do a little experiment. Grab a male friend of yours (you're a man, right?) and walk down a busy street hand-in-hand with them. Count how many filthy looks you get.

If you're a little bisexual I guess you could make out a little, but that's not necessary for the experiment.

Now repeat it with a female friend.

See a difference? That difference is why most gays don't express themselves in public the way most straights feel free to do. Some are brave enough to do so, but most aren't.
on Aug 11, 2007
So you admit you're gay?


i'm confused. he's not really american but is really a maricon?
on Aug 11, 2007
he's not really american but is really a maricon?


That one was so good, you get an "insightful" for it.
on Aug 11, 2007
That one was so good, you get an "insightful" for it.


Agreed. THAT may be one of the funniest things I've read all day!
on Aug 11, 2007
I don't know what exactly was the point of the article since the writer claims it to be not what everyone thought it was. But the writer did an excelent job doing what very few have been able to do on this site. He got those who normally disagree in all other articles to agree on this one article. With the exception of 1 person.
on Aug 11, 2007
Who said I agree? I just thought kingbee's "maricon" line was worth applause! LOL!
on Aug 11, 2007
OK I see, I forgot the "which each other" part.
on Aug 11, 2007
My bad, wrote this past midnight.
2 Pages1 2