Valentines gifts and more at Alegria Online Mall
What is historic about a two-bit hustler getting elected? Aren’t these type of people always elected in to office? I remember that Mr. Obama’s standard answers when confronted with a discrepancy between his understanding of the facts and some else’s understanding were it was not me or I did not know that.
Mr. Obama spent 20 years in church with a minister such as Jeremiah Wright and claims he was never aware of Mr. Wright’s sentiments. Mr. Obama started his campaign for the American presidency in William Ayres house, yet Mr. Obama claims he is not a friend of Mr. Ayres. Mr. Rescoe is under federal indictment and Obama says he has done nothing wrong, even though was his client. In addition, somehow Mr. Rescoe sold Mr. .Obama a house under market value. Mr. Obama helped the current embarrassed governor of Illinois get elected but does not know anything about “Blogo’s” attempts to sell Mr. Obama’s vacated senate seat.
Moreover, in recent days, Mr Obama has back tracked from the promises he made during his campaign. Mr. Obama plans to leave in place Bush’s tax cuts. Mr. Obama does not plan to immediately close [Guitmo]. Mr. Obama does not plan to immediately withdraw American troops from Iraq.
All of these inconsistencies sound like lies to me. Furthermore, what exactly is historic about Obama. Human beings have been elected to the presidency many times before. Is Mr. Obama not human? Have we entered a time in American history where something other then education and experience qualify a person to be president?
Where is the proof that female anatomy and skin pigment make a person more able to dispense the duties and responsibilities of the president of the United States? I was reading through my college history text book and saw many examples of bad female and ethnic leaders. Therefore, I do not see where a person’s body parts or skin color make them smarter then other people.
The historic enslavement of people by chains and by depriving them of basic human dignity is a deplorable stain on American history. However, this problem was corrected and all rights and privileges were granted to people who were previously slaves.
Look at history and you will see that something happened from the point of Emancipation and modern day history. Politicians made minorities special classes. Before these politics most people wanted to work and were very responsible.
Today, in 2009 I can say I have met lowlifes and successful people of all experiences. It is my opinion, if any one is blaming some else or some circumstance for not having the life they want, it is just cause they need some one to blame for making bad choices.
Now, we are going to have to pay for the decisions of these people. Obama’s political rhetoric is one of American economy leaving people behind, America is an abrasive and abusive country, and America’s image in the international community is tarnished.
I don’t believe any on this rhetoric. Furthermore, it is the wrong attitude to take the country forward. Two things need to happen for America to continue to be strong and productive. Business people need to have confidence in investing in America. Second, America needs to remain secure. The rhetoric of “redistributing wealth” will not motivate people to invest. The rhetoric of America needs to apologize will only embolden the enemy.
Today, considering the inconsistencies between rhetoric and behavior, why would you believe Obama. Historic would of been a person who keeps his word being elected, regardless of political ideology.
Technorati Tags: obama