<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0"><channel><title>preserving life Comments - Brought to you by JoeUser</title><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/rss/comments</link><copyright>© 2006 - 2008 Stardock Corporation. All rights reserved.</copyright><description>opinion pages and articles on the beauty of life: friendship, family, love, romance, marriage, parenting, etc...</description><language>en-us</language><pubDate>2008-07-04T02:55:49</pubDate><lastBuildDate>2008-07-04T02:55:49</lastBuildDate><docs>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html</docs><generator>Stardock Rss Generator v1.0, Andrew Powell</generator><managingEditor>info@stardock.com</managingEditor><webMaster>apowell@stardock.com</webMaster><item><author>little-whip</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315216</comments><description><![CDATA[It's beyond ridiculous to see an illegal alien who isn't even supposed to BE here, much less WORKING here, bellyaching about his job and how unfaiiiiiirrrrrrrr it all is.<br/><br/>Go back to Mexico, jesus lopez-ledesma.  Don't they need cab drivers in Tiuajana or are they all still on burros there?]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315216</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315216</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>little-whip on McCain will help the free market.  Obama will destroy it.</title></item><item><author>Cikomyr</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315216</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">record spending , adding to the deficit high gas prices and high unemployment</div><br/><br/>Record economic development caused by over-indebtment by most of the citizens. You forgot that one. Problem is, all of it was merely a bubble. When credit crashed, the bubble popped.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315216</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315216</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Cikomyr on McCain will help the free market.  Obama will destroy it.</title></item><item><author>CharlesCS</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/317062</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>You know, for a guy who is constantly attacked for being an illegal immigrant, your English writing is somewhat impressive. But I have to wonder why you never comment on your own artciles? Why do you spend so much time writing about you opions on politics that hardly anyone comments on and you yourself chose to avoid once posted? Do you ever feel you need to make a stand on you opinions? Or does simply having people read and think about your comments satisfy you curiousity for writing on JU?</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/317062</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/317062</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>CharlesCS on It's a Republican Election Year: Congress has a 12% unfavorable rating.</title></item><item><author>Azraptor85</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315216</comments><description><![CDATA[Yep the Bush years sure were great huh?  record spending , adding to the deficit  high gas prices and high unemployment , yeah republicans do great with the economy lets give them 8 more years to see how more screwed up things can get. god forbid obama takes us back to the prosperity of the 90's , that would be horrible. ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315216</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315216</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Azraptor85 on McCain will help the free market.  Obama will destroy it.</title></item><item><author>SanChonino</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/316646</comments><description><![CDATA[.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/316646</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/316646</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>SanChonino on Obama, McCain, Immigration, and Religious Rights in the Military.</title></item><item><author>Mystikmind</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/316074</comments><description><![CDATA[Hi<br/><br/>I live in Australia and i don't hear much detail about anything to do with the American election, penty of brief headlines though!<br/><br/>I have noticed that David Letterman never puts negative jokes on him like he does to Clinton or Bush.<br/><br/>I thought at first it was some kind of sick joke when i heard his name! I mean it is still pretty funny to be honest.... lets play a game and pick the word that dousn't fit: Iotola, Obama, Hussein, Gedafi, Jihad,,,, Barak! Hehehe, what is 'barak' there for, did his parents slip up or is there some other horror that exists with a similar sounding name to 'Barak'? <br/><br/>I have seen a brief glimpse of Obama here and there. When i first saw him appear on the scene i knew instantly that he would defeat Clinton. The reason i knew is because as a Christian myself, i know what direction the world needs to go, in order for the bible to be forfilled. Obama strikes me as a prime candidate for that task, and i am sure he will become president on that same basis. Perhaps he is not 'the one' but a link in the chain so to speak.<br/><br/>Anyhow, you guys in America don't get to choose your presidents anyway, its out of the voters hands. ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/316074</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/316074</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Mystikmind on Why can't some Americans see Obama's flaws?</title></item><item><author>whillice</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>I normally don't get into these debates-- they're generally
worthless as they will not sway anyone on either side of the issue --
but I saw a statistic i couldn't help but wonder about.</p>
<p>Lulapilgrim wrote:<br /></p>
<p><div class="Article_Quote">Dr. Bernard Nathanson, a former champion of abortion,
admitted he performed some 10,000 abortions ought to know. He's now
converted and tells how he and the pro-abortion camp worked hard to
confuse us on the status of the preborn baby.</div></p>
<p>I did some
research, and Dr. Nathanson renounced abortion in 1977, after helping
to make it legal in New York in 1970.&nbsp; Soooooo, 10,000 abortions in 7
years?</p>
<p>If he worked every day and never rested, that's still 3.9
abortions per day.&nbsp; If he worked a normal 5 day workweek, it's 4.5
abortions per day. Also, according to the CDC, approximately 100,000
abortions are performed every year in New York City.&nbsp; So, if he
performed 10,000 of those, that's approximately 7% of all abortions
between 1970 and 1977 that he, himself performed in a city of over 10
million people.&nbsp; Really?</p>
<p><br />So, that fact is just laughably
false.&nbsp; If you're playing fast and loose with that one, who knows what
else is suspect in what you're saying?<br /></p>
<p>That being said, I think abortion is wrong and a terrible, ugly
thing.&nbsp; I'd like to see there be zero abortions every year.&nbsp; but what
are we going to do, make it illegal?&nbsp; We tried to stop another societal
vice, drinking, during prohibtion, and it only increased drinking in
the US.&nbsp; Are we going to send doctors to jail for murder of a fetus?&nbsp;
And the mother?&nbsp; Conspiracy to commit murder?&nbsp; Ok, so we prevented you
from having an abortion, now you're going to be forced to have the
child and then you go to jail and your child is raised by the
government in a foster system, right? (because unless the baby is
white, s/he has little chance of being adopted)&nbsp; Should the doctors and
mothers get the death penalty?&nbsp; If a fetus is life, isn't that the only
logical thing to do?&nbsp; If that's the road you want to go down, fine.&nbsp;
But I'd rather prevent abortions by preventing unwanted pregnancies,
something the pro-life crowd has not seemed to embrace very
whole-heartedly.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>whillice on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>Throumbas</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>If find the fact that you approve of nuking civilians to justify the means absolutely ridiculous and horrifying. That is the exact same reason "terrorist" keep doing what they do. Isn't it time Americans grew up already like the rest of the civilized world and stop thinking like religious radicals?</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Throumbas on Did Obama miss out on an opportunity to donate 200 million to the poor?</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">This issue is inflammatory; more importantly though it is resolved by law and the majority of Americans' support on the issue.</div><br/><br/>Yes, I agree abortion certainly is an inflammatory, contentious issue. <br/><br/>I disagree though that a majority support abortion. As far as abortion being resolved by law, let's not forget it was foisted upon us by the US Supreme Court in 1973. There is no Constitutional right to abortion. <br/><br/>Abortion destroys itself. The evil inner workings are being exposed. It's a blood and gore business. If you don't believe me, get some photos of the victims of saline scalding, surgical dismemberment, and vacuum suctioning into a thousands pieces. For these reasons, it will never become acceptable or respectable no matter how hard one argues for it. <br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">The main argument against ALL abortions seems to be one merely of disputes of morality rather of science or reason.</div><br/><br/>What's scientific about killing a baby in the womb? <br/><br/>There is a mountain of medical, psychological and sociological evidence that abortion harms women, men and families. Check out www.AfterAbortion.org . <br/><br/><br/> ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[lula posts: <div class="Article_Quote">What I've got to say about <B>Barack Hussein Obama</B><br/><br/>KINGBEE POSTS: <br/><br/>what i've got to say about joseph a. ratzinger is neither he nor obama selected his own middle name altho i guess it'd be equally fair to imply ratzinger's middle initial might as well stand for 'adolph' seeing as how he--and not barak--was a member of the hitler youth organization.</div><br/><br/>Both Joseph Alois Ratzinger and Barack Hussein Obama were given their names by their respective parents. <br/><br/>What's the sensitivity over Obama's middle name all about? Is Obama ashamed of his Muslim heritage? Obama's parents gave him his name in honor of his paternal grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama. Hussein is not an African, but an Arabaic name, as is "Baraka". It comes from the Qur'an meaning "blessed." <br/>   <br/>And for the record, Joseph Ratzinger at 14 was forced to join Hitler's Youth group and when it was possible for him to escape, he did so. The Jerusalem Post defending him saying, it was rubbish to suggest that he had Nazi sympathies. His brother was a priest and his family was strongly anti Nazi. <br/><br/>Ironically, it was Joseph Ratzinger's fellow Germans like Nietzsche and Heidegger who gave us the diabolical idea that moral absolutes are nonsense. <br/><br/>The day before he was elected the new pope, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger warned of a "dictatorship of relativism which does not recognize anything as for certain and which has as it's highest goal one's own ego and one's own desires."  What reigns supreme is the false idea that each individual possesses his or her own morality.<br/><br/>Pope Benedict often speaks and has written much about conscience and truth. He identifies one of the problems today is the idea that one need not feel guilty about sin and doing wrong. "He who no longer notices that killing is a sin has fallen farther than the one who still recognizes the shamefulness of his actions, becasue the former is further removed from the truth and conversion." This is the state of a "truthless world". He pointed out that a man of conscience is one who never acquires tolerance, well-being, success, public standing, and approval on the part of prevailling opinion, at the expense of truth."  <br/><br/>For anyone who has ears to hear, he was warning us that a society that refuses to acknowledge that morality is a social attribute is bound to culturally implode.   <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>kingbee</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">your own successful call-in radio show!</div><br/><br/>aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahah]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>kingbee on Did Obama miss out on an opportunity to donate 200 million to the poor?</title></item><item><author>kingbee</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">I BET YOU MY COLLEGE SCIENCE PROFESSORS DIDN’T THINK I WOULD BE USING SCIECNE FOR THIS.</div><br/><br/>you win--if for no other reason than they didn't expect you'd be using science for anything at all in the working world.  <br/><br/>either your customers would want fries 'with that'.  <br/><br/>or they wouldn't.   ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>kingbee on Did Obama miss out on an opportunity to donate 200 million to the poor?</title></item><item><author>cactoblasta</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</comments><description><![CDATA[Is anyone else getting those ads throughout the article? I hope that angelfire site pays off for you Jesse - maybe you can the money to start your own successful call-in radio show!]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>cactoblasta on Did Obama miss out on an opportunity to donate 200 million to the poor?</title></item><item><author>clintonbabe</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</comments><description><![CDATA[Did I read this right?  Al Qaeda moved it's operations to Iraq to fight Americans?  It sounds like you are saying that was Bush's strategy in the first place.  Lets attack a country and bring the enemy to us.  Are you on crack?<br/><br/>Further more, I don't know if you are a citizen or not according to Cedarbird.  If you are not, i agree with him/her. If you are, you are wrong in that: Bush didn't win the election against Kerry, he was appointed by the Supreme Court (or did you forget that one?).  Secondly you made a mistake in voting for him (if you are able to vote).<br/><br/>I suppose you still support Bush?  Now that's a mistake. B/c of his policies (or lack therof): <br/>1. He has the lowest approval rating of any President in history.<br/>2.  We're spending billions rebuilding a place that isn't even ours b/c of a war that never should have been allowed to take place searching for something that wasn't even there while New Orleans is still in ruins.  <br/>        WHere are the WMD's by the way?  (You don't here THAT blurted out on the "Liberal Media" ((which happens to be dominated in the South btw by right wing idiots like Neil Boortz and Sean Hannity who sound more like fascists)))<br/><br/>3.  He wants to bend or break the Constitution with human rights abuses in places like Abu Graib and Gitmo (and don't give me the cop out: what the military does he has no knowledge of...he's the CIC, he sets the standard for crying out loud!)<br/><br/>4. And again if you did vote for him you didn't do your research.  While he was gov of Texas "Houston overtook LA as America's smoggiets city, ranked 1st in toxic releases to the environment, 1st in total toxic air emissions from industrialized facilities, 1st in toxic chemical accidnets, and 1st in cancer-causing pollution. 15 of the nation's 30 highest smog readings were all taken in Texas, and every major urban area either failed to meet the EPA's minimum air quality standards, or was on the verge of failing" (EPA Toxics Release Inventory Database; Crimes Against Nature by RFK, Jr).<br/><br/>Al Gore won an Oscar and the Nobel Price for his pro-environment attitude and I voted for him.  Sounds like you made a mistake <img src="http://images.stardock.com/smiles/Smile.gif" border=0 align="absmiddle"><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>clintonbabe on Bush has succeeded in spite of democratic obstacles.</title></item><item><author>TiTaNsFaN690</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[This issue is inflammatory; more importantly though it is resolved by law and the majority of Americans' support on the issue. The main argument against ALL abortions seems to be one merely of disputes of morality rather of science or reason. There are <B>always</B> exceptions to the rule (eg. would you consider a woman bearing a child with tay sachs or down syndrome 'evil' if they sought an abortion?)<br/><br/>The issue of morality is in itself flawed, especially if there are still puritanical individuals unwilling to compromise their bibles with their textbooks.<br/><br/>I suggest the reading of Albert Camus for some perspective on the subject matter; "The Stranger" dips very vividly into the greyness of life's choices. <br/><br/>As for abortions (without furthering the currently unresolvable debate) I personally hope there shall never be a day when women are held in the tyrannical clutches of pregnancy against their will and are forced to bear a child they have no care for.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>TiTaNsFaN690 on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>kingbee</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Let me see if I can explain war to you, at least my perception of war.</div><br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">if the US had not used the hydrogen bomb on Japan, Hitler and his allies could of won WWII.</div><br/><br/>yeah well...<br/><br/>1.neither the us nor anyone else hadda hydrogen bomb in 1945.<br/><br/>2. germany surrendered and hitler had been dead bout three months before we dropped the bomb on hiroshima.<br/><br/>this is prolly too much to ask--especially a bonafide graduate of correspondence school such as yourself--but next time you feel compelled to splain somethin to the rest of us, you might wanna first determine whether you yourself know anything about it. ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315956</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>kingbee on Did Obama miss out on an opportunity to donate 200 million to the poor?</title></item><item><author>kingbee</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">What I've got to say about Barack Hussein Obama</div><br/><br/>what i've got to say about joseph a. ratzinger is neither he nor obama selected his own middle name altho i guess it'd be equally fair to imply ratzinger's middle initial might as well stand for 'adolph' seeing as how he--and not barak--was a member of the hitler youth organization. <br/><br/>attempting to deliberately mislead others is exactly what's proscribed by that commandment not to bear false witness is it not?  ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>kingbee on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Contradicting? No,</div><br/><br/>Good luck Polijunkie. On this one, TitansFan690 either wittingly or unwittingly doesn't see the forest for the trees.<br/><br/>It boils down to turning a blind eye to the evil of abortion and being unwilling to judge the actions of those politicians who further its practice by voting to keep it "legal".<br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">Obama as a death lord</div><br/><br/>Well, isn't Obama playing God with innocent lives just as the majority of US Supreme Court Justices did 35 years ago when they invented laws that condemned innocent unborn babies to painful death for the crime of being "inconvenient" or as Obama has stated, "a mistake"?<br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">but that certainly does not make him the next Hitler sending babies to the slaughterhouse...</div><br/><br/>Interesting choice of words, "Hitler" and "slaughterhouse".<br/><br/>All the US judges and all the politicians, Obama included, are responsible for the abortion holocaust which elipses Hitler's--somewhere around 45 million victims of abortuaries and counting...to the tune of 4,000 daily in the US alone. <br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">I disagree on your black and white interpretation of morality, there is hardly ever a clear "good and evil" in the real world unless you're a puritan nutcase.</div><br/><br/>Every time an abortion is performed, an innocent baby is murdered. Those who see abortion as grey are the real holocasut deniers. Nine times out of ten, they are the ones who are largely driven by the need "to feel good about themselves".<br/><br/>Obama's 100% pro-abortion voting record proves he's a coward, besides being an insincere, selfish hypocrite.<br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>catguy</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</comments><description><![CDATA[This post is so spectacularly uninformed that it makes my head hurt.<br/><br/>On Bush's watch, during his administration:<br/><br/>The United States has suffered the most successful terrorist attack in history, partly, perhaps, because the Administration ignored its own anti-terrorist experts, specifically Richard Clarke.  If there has ever been a more stark example of failed leadership than Bush sitting in a second-grade classroom for seven minutes after being informed by Andy Card that "the country is under attack", I can't think of it.<br/><br/>The United States has suffered from the "permanent political campaign" philosophy embodied by Mssrs. Bush and Cheney and pointed out by Scott McClellan in his recently released book, of which Jesse probably has not heard and will not read.  The entire Bush Administration has been one long series of violations of the Hatch Act, of which Jesse has not heard and will most likely not bother to find out about.<br/><br/>The Federal government agency FEMA, staffed entirely by sycophants and campaign-contributors to Bush, executed the most spectacularly failed response to a natural disaster in history.  Ironically enough, it was probably the response to Katrina that exposed Bush and the Republicans as the inept creatures that they are and cost them control of Congress in 2006.  They couldn't protect America from standing water, for God's sake.  Anyone who thinks they are protecting us from terrorist attacks is ignoring our open borders and almost total lack of port security.<br/><br/>The votes weren't all counted in Florida in 2000 or Ohio in 2004.  There was massive voter-disenfranchisement practiced by the Republicans in both elections.  A republican political operator in New Hampshire was actually tried, found guilty, and served time for tampering with the last election, wrote a book about it that makes very interesting reading and that indicates that his instructions came directly from the highest levels of the campaign, possibly from the White House itself.  Jesse doesn't know about this person or his book and will not read it.<br/><br/>The American economy is in the worst shape it has been in quite a while because of this administration's policies.  Gasoline was about a buck and a quarter a gallon when Bush took office.  We had an economic surplus from Clinton when Bush took office.  Now, even Jesse probably knows that gasoline is over $5.00 a gallon in some parts of the country.  We also have the biggest deficit in history, because Bush, who ran as a fiscal conservative, has been as fiscally responsible as a teenager with a stolen credit card.  He has paid for the entire Iraq War on borrowed money, the first time in history that a president has not raised taxes in time of war.  Why did he do this?  For the same reason he wouldn't put in a draft.  If he tried to pay for the war with higher taxes, his Republican base wouldn't support it.  If he was going to possibly draft their children to fight the war, they wouldn't support it.  Instead, you had the back-door draft of stop-loss.<br/><br/>Bush, who never misses a chance to be photographed in front of soldiers, allowed them to receive absolutely shameful medical attention when they were wounded.  Rather than allowing the nation to honor its war dead by even seeing them, he has not allowed their coffins to be photographed.  Recently, at Arlington Cemetery, when the family of one of the fallen actually invited the press to attend his funeral, they were not allowed within 50 yards of the ceremony.  <br/><br/>People have been unjustly imprisoned and tortured under our flag and in our name.  Bush has broken laws (the Nuremberg Principles) that the United States helped write afer World War II.  By the very definition of those principles, Bush, Cheney, Condi, Colin, and Rummy may well be war-criminals.  Bush's policies have been denounced by a virtual parade of people, some civilian, some military, who left either his administration or the military.  The attitude yesterday of one Republican congressman to Scott McClellan was typical.  Responding to McClellan's book, which states that the Bush Administration regularly fed false information to America, was in permanent campaign mode instead of governing, and other allegations of impropriety, the congressman said that it would have been more patriotic for McClellan to not reveal the pattern of Bush Admin lies and deceptions, but rather to "carry them to your grave".<br/><br/>Here'a an open question to the writer of this post and all others in the GOP?  Why are you so hot to defend Bush?  He ran as a conservative, yet has done nothing according to conservative policies.  He specifically scorned what he called "nation-building", yet engaged in what might very well be an illegal war of aggression in Iraq and is now engaged in nation-building, with about as much success as you can imagine.  He ran as a fiscal conservative, and has turned out to be a fiscal radical, running up a mountain of debt that staggers the imagination.  The man's entire life story is one long history of failures.  He is to failure what Ted Bundy was to murder, yet you seem to worship the ground he walks on.  I don't get it.<br/><br/>One of you, can't remember if it was ParaTed2k or Dr. Guy, said Clinton was the worst president in history (loathesome man, yes - worst president, not even close).  Just what criteria were used?  I have no idea, as no evidence was presented.  Clinton created more jobs, kept the country safer (no 9/11 on his watch), did a better job responding to various natural disasters because under him FEMA was actually run by people with a background in disaster-management who knew what they were doing (no Katrina on his watch), and managed the economy better, leaving a record suplus after having paid back the deficits of the Reagan/Bush I years.  He also won his war without many casualties, while the Iraq War has now gone on longer than World War II.  It is now almost 1900 days since your "I like to play dress up" President told us that major combat operations in Iraq were over from the deck of the USS Lincoln.<br/><br/>Oh, let's talk about that.  The official White House line was that Bush flew out to see and met the Lincoln, which was on her way home after a long deployment in the Middle East.  Its crew had not seen their families for almost a year.  Surprise, surprise, the story turned out not to be true.  The Lincoln was in fact put into a holding pattern off the coast of San Diego, while the crew was kept from seeing their families so Bush could give his speech in front of the now-infamous "Mission Accomplished" banner.  The coastline was actually in sight, but Bush's PR folks made sure that only the open ocean was visible to the television audience.  If a Democratic President had done such a thing, you would be livid, just at the fact that he was using the crew of the Lincoln as props for his speech and was prolonging their time away from their loved ones.  But when Bush does it, you just don't care.  I don't get it.<br/><br/>There is an Africa proverb that is more generally applicable here than I would like.  "To not know is bad, but to not wish to know is worse."  There's not a lot of substance or fact coming from the right here.  I've encountered a whole lot of people who have very strong opinions built on vapor.  When asked to talk about the Nuremberg Principles, torture committed in our name, Bush's economic policy and why they like it, they either obfuscate, deflect, or talk about the good old days of Reagan.  They are happy to talk about the Bible, how much they hated Clinton, or how much they hate Obama, but they will not attempt to mount a concrete, fact-based defense of Bush because they can't.<br/><br/>The modern Republican Party has long known that you mobilize people to vote based on their emotions, not on their knowledge or understanding.  Some of their operatives have even stated that in print, knowing their words would never be read by the Republican faithful.  That pretty much reflects my experience here, as exemplified by Jesse's post.<br/><br/>Well, I just started my summer vacation from teaching 7th-grade history.  I think I'll go donate money to Obama and find other ways to become more politically active.  It's time the grown-ups were back in charge, and I have to do my part.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>catguy on Bush has succeeded in spite of democratic obstacles.</title></item><item><author>TiTaNsFaN690</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">but still I must agree abortions should be kept before the third trimester, it is basically murder after that point. Titan if you believe the above statement then surely you would agree that obama furthers a culture of death since Mr. "Obama voted against a bill that would protect a baby's life if that child is born during a "late term partial birth abortion" procedure."Your own statements are contradictory... Which is it.</div><br/><br/>Contradicting? No, I agree that abortions should be kept before the third trimester (the vast majority of which are anyway), that however does not justify slandering Obama as a death lord because his opinion differs from mine. His reasoning differs on the matter I'm sure (I can't justify aborting a baby with developed sensory skills) but that certainly does not make him the next Hitler sending babies to the slaughterhouse... there is nothing culturally relevant to his support of the issue. I'd be much more worried about the death penalty "furthering a culture of death" than abortions.<br/><br/>Probably not the best wording with "you have no right" @ lula but I dont see how hysterically slandering someone is ever proper methodology in expressing one's point of view. <br/><br/>I disagree on your black and white interpretation of morality, there is hardly ever a clear "good and evil" in the real world unless you're a puritan nutcase. ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>TiTaNsFaN690 on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>Polijunkie</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[but still I must agree abortions should be kept before the third trimester, it is basically murder after that point. <br/><br/>Titan if you believe the above statement then surely you would agree that obama furthers a culture of death since Mr. "Obama voted against a bill that would protect a baby's life if that child is born during a "late term partial birth abortion" procedure."<br/><br/>Your own statements are contradictory... Which is it.<br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Polijunkie on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Let me guess, you're against stem cell research as well?</div><br/><br/>Actually, I'm all for stem cell research...<br/><br/>but not embryonic stem cells...they are little people in their first stages of life, much the same as you and I were at one time. <br/><br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">Furthering the culture of death and cooperating in evil... Your rationale seems to have slipped a tad wouldn't you say?</div><br/><br/>No, I believe in absolutes...and also that you gotta draw the line somewhere or there won't be a line drawn at all. <br/><br/>With most things, I question not so much the legalities (mainly because in reality I can't do too much if anything about that angle), but the moral implications of the issue. The slaughter of the innocents by Herod was legal. <br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">no one is out to do anything inherently evil;</div><br/><br/>Ya, right...and are you in the market for some dry swampland?<br/><br/>Yet, sadly true, in a way...for we've become insensitive to our own ills and turn away from the problems that are not our own. That attribute has been lost through erosion of common sense..on a higher level...conscience. <br/><br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">it is a conflict of morals I agree,</div><br/><br/>We've all got the ability to recognize right from wrong (evil); good from bad.<br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">but <B>you have no right </B>to declare that Obama furthers "the culture of death."</div><br/><br/>This, I'm most curious to learn why you think that "I have no right" .....<br/><br/><br/>  ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>TiTaNsFaN690</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[Let me guess, you're against stem cell research as well? I liked Horton Hears a Who as much as the next guy, but telling me a ball of cells = "a person is a person no matter how small" is scientifically inaccurate, any grad student with a microscope will tell you that. <br/><br/>Life begins at fertilization eh? Well I hope you and your blastula live happily ever after. Any freshman biology book will tell you that (mind you I'm a history major) the developments in the first trimester comprise of no significant brain activity, nor does the fetus have any sensory ability. Any argument that contradicts that is pro-life nonsense (not to say their isn't nonsense on the other side of the issue either.)<br/><br/>Furthering the culture of death and cooperating in evil... Your rationale seems to have slipped a tad wouldn't you say? I'd save the melodrama for the confession box, no one is out to do anything inherently evil; it is a conflict of morals I agree, but you have no right to declare that Obama furthers "the culture of death."<br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>TiTaNsFaN690 on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">It is a last resort after all; as this country pushes more toward distributing birth control means and educating young people about sexual activity (rather than hysterically demanding abstinence) we will inevitably see a decline in abortions.</div><br/><br/>Actually, permissive contraceptive classroom sex instruction has more school kids fornicating, thus the rates of STDs, STIs, and of abortion of young girls, ages 13-19 is higher. <br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">In the mean time, abortion is not murder - forcing a woman to bear a child she is not fit to raise is much more sinister in my opinion.</div><br/><br/>I've already said: <br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">This is the rationalization of the culture of death that says if your gonna kill an innocent in the womb, you better convince yourself and others that it's right....that you do it out of compassion, blah, blah.</div><br/><br/>No sale with me. <br/><br/>Every time Obama votes for abortion and its related issues, he's furthering the culture of death and cooperating in evil and I'll have no part of it. <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">The reality however is that women will always be seeking abortions for an array of reasons, so rather than expose a large segment of the population to dangerous back-alley abortion conditions, why not provide a healthy and safe means for the mother to realize a decision she has long made about her own body.</div><br/><br/>The "back alley abortion conditions" is yet another utilitarian argument for the need of legalized abortion. This was thoroughy discussed on another blog.  It would be well worth it for you to read Locamama's  "The anti-choicers do it again."<br/><br/>Before Roe v. Wade (1973), there were far fewer abortions and most were performed by medical personnel in proper conditions. Bottom line: "Legalization" produces increased, now some 1.3 million per year in the USA, numbers of abortion, but not necessarily safer ones. <br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Something tells me its not any medical doctor that would tell me as much as any pro-life medical doctor haha.</div><br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">we can dissect the science as well as the abstract/morality of it all day,</div><br/><br/>Yes, we sure can...however, I gave my reply based upon your fully loaded questions. <br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">Alive is a relative term wouldn't you say?</div><br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">The baby in the womb isn't "alive" before the third trimester and so it isn't murder then?</div><br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">Something tells me its not any medical doctor that would tell me as much as any pro-life medical doctor haha.</div><br/><br/>Please humor me while I make one more point on when life begins in the womb becasue that happens to be one of the most fundamental issues for both the pro-life and pro-abortion camps. <br/><br/>Dr. Bernard Nathanson, a former champion of abortion, admitted he performed some 10,000 abortions ought to know. He's now converted and tells how he and the pro-abortion camp worked hard to confuse us on the status of the preborn baby.<br/><br/>Truth is the science of embryology has long known that a person starts life as an embryo within the body of a female and that embryo is formed from the fusion of 2 single cells. the ovum and the sperm. It's really quite simple: life begins at fertilization. <br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">women will seek abortions and we as a society have the obligation to provide them a healthy and safe means of obtaining them.</div><br/><br/>Do we say the same of women addicted to smoking? <br/><br/>This is the rationalization of the culture of death that says if your gonna kill an innocent in the womb, you better convince yourself and others that it's right....that you do it out of compassion, blah, blah. After this, the rationalization requires that society affirms the spread of death from the unborn to the nearly born (partial birth abortion), and then to the infirm, disabled, chronically ill, or otherwise burdensome individuals.  <br/><br/>This is the abortion movements claim but it's absolutely not true, right or correct. Just because some women seek abortions as a solution to their "problem", doesn't mean society has an obligation to provide them. No sir, not at all. That would be societal affirmation that abortion is a positive good, when it's not. It's just the opposite. Abortion is taking an innocent human's life and that can never, ever be morally justified.  <br/><br/>Sure, people will inevitably try to advance their own moral disorders. However, once a  society adopts those justifications for those moral disorders as its own (public policy), it's headed for the ash heap of history.     <br/> <br/><br/> <br/><br/><br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>TiTaNsFaN690</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Check with any medical doctor and you'll find that they've determined that life begins at fertilization. Yup, at fertilization a unique human life begins.</div><br/><br/>Something tells me its not any medical doctor that would tell me as much as any pro-life medical doctor haha. But like I said before (which you so kindly chose to disregard <img src="http://images.stardock.com/smiles/Tongue.gif" border=0 align="absmiddle">) we can dissect the science as well as the abstract/morality of it all day, but when it comes down to it women will seek abortions and we as a society have the obligation to provide them a healthy and safe means of obtaining them.<br/><br/>Once again to quote myself:<br/><br/><br/><div class="Article_Quote">It is a last resort after all; as this country pushes more toward distributing birth control means and educating young people about sexual activity (rather than hysterically demanding abstinence) we will inevitably see a decline in abortions. In the mean time, abortion is not murder - forcing a woman to bear a child she is not fit to raise is much more sinister in my opinion.</div>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>TiTaNsFaN690 on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Alive is a relative term wouldn't you say? I don't consider minor brainstem activity as "alive" personally in the first and and second trimesters,</div><br/><br/>Check with any medical doctor and you'll find that they've determined that life begins at fertilization. Yup, at fertilization a unique human life begins.<br/><br/>I guess you haven't seen any ultrasound photos of how wonderfully formed little babies are even at 6 weeks brainwaves are detected. By 8 weeks, the baby is kicking and fingerprints form. A week later, the baby can hear, turn his head, frown, hiccup, and react to loud noises. By 11 weeks, all bodily functions are functioning, and the baby can grasp, yawn, suck and swallow. At 12 weeks, bodily parts that enable pain sensation are in place. At 13-15 weeks, a baby's taste buds resemble a mature adults and the baby is able to taste the flavor of his mother's meals through the amniotic fluid. <br/><br/>So, no "alive" isn't a relative term at all, at least when it comes to unborn life in the mother's womb.  <br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>TiTaNsFaN690</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">I must agree abortions should be kept before the third trimester, it is basically murder after that point.What's your reasoning here? The baby in the womb isn't "alive" before the third trimester and so it isn't murder then?</div><br/><br/><br/>Alive is a relative term wouldn't you say? I don't consider minor brainstem activity as "alive" personally in the first and and second trimesters, but by the time the baby has significant sensory input (third trimester) I do feel it is developed enough to be considered a human being. <br/><br/>I think the issue is best discussed from a practical standpoint rather than one of mixed sciences or clashing ideologies. The ideal (for both sides) would be to never have an abortion performed in this country ever wouldn't you say? No one wants to destroy human potential.* The reality however is that women will always be seeking abortions for an array of reasons, so rather than expose a large segment of the population to dangerous back-alley abortion conditions, why not provide a healthy and safe means for the mother to realize a decision she has long made about her own body.<br/><br/>It is a last resort after all; as this country pushes more toward distributing birth control means and educating young people about sexual activity (rather than hysterically demanding abstinence) we will inevitably see a decline in abortions. In the mean time, abortion is not murder - forcing a woman to bear a child she is not fit to raise is much more sinister in my opinion.  ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>TiTaNsFaN690 on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">I must agree abortions should be kept before the third trimester, it is basically murder after that point.</div><br/><br/>What's your reasoning here? The baby in the womb isn't "alive" before the third trimester and so it isn't murder then?<br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>TiTaNsFaN690</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[Eh abortions are fine and I usually find ignorance to blame for a large portion of people in the U.S. still being pro-life... but still I must agree abortions should be kept before the third trimester, it is basically murder after that point. ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>TiTaNsFaN690 on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>lulapilgrim</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</comments><description><![CDATA[<p><div class="Article_Quote">Obama voted against a bill that would protect a baby's life if that child is born during a "late term partial birth abortion" procedure. This means that if when a doctor is doing a partial birth abortion procedure and the child is completely born the doctor can let that child die. What can you say about a person, Mr. Obama, who thinks this is correct?</div></p>
<p>What I've got to say about Barack Hussein Obama is that he is a, insincere,&nbsp;selfish hypocrite.</p>
<p>When he was cadging votes during the Maryland and Virgina primaries, he said that "we've got to be our brother's keeper" and "hope focuses on the future"..</p>
<p>First, by his vote against the bill, Obama refuses to recognize the little baby who survives an abortion IS&nbsp; his little brother (or sister).</p>
<p>Second,&nbsp;when Obama says, we've got to be our brother's keeper, he doesn't mean it to include&nbsp;the little baby&nbsp;who survives an abortion .</p>
<p>He selfishly allowed his own little girls to come to term and be born, yet by his 100% pro abortion voting record denies other babies to be born.&nbsp;What about their hope? What about their future?</p>
<p>Obama has promised the pro-abortion&nbsp;crowd that he'll work&nbsp;diligently to deny unborn babies their&nbsp;freedom to be born to enjoy all lifes choices.&nbsp;By his votes, Obama denies unborn babies&nbsp;their unalienable First Amendment right&nbsp;to life.</p>
<p>He claims he's a Christian, yet doesn't obey Almighty God's commandment, "Thou shalt not kill".&nbsp; You can't vote for abortion and be Christian at the same time.</p>
<p>Obama&nbsp;uses people,&nbsp;even his own daughters. At a townhall meeting in Pennsylvania, he said something like this:</p>
<p>&nbsp;when it comes to HIV/AIDS, education is most important, teaching children&nbsp;about contraception, becasue I've got 2 daughters&nbsp;9 and 6 years old. I'm going to teach them about faith and morals, but if they make a mistake, <strong>I don't want them punished with a baby. &nbsp;</strong></p>
<p>His solution is to KILL THE MISTAKE. His solution is to KILL HIS GRANDCHILD.</p>
<p>We've got to get the truth out....as far as the Democrat's presidential candidate,&nbsp;Obama is concerned.&nbsp;&nbsp;He sees some unborn babies as punishment, not gifts from Almighty God.</p>
<p>His message is----if elected, I will continue the killing our progeny in the womb by keeping abortion on demand. &nbsp;Some unborn babies arent' hope for the future...and they certainly aren't our little brothers and sisters.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315690</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>lulapilgrim on Obama and partial birth abortion, new oil drilling, and McCain.</title></item><item><author>Cedarbird</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</comments><description><![CDATA[Shut up, Jesse.  Just, stop.  You have no idea what you are talking about and are the LAST person to be talking about what is or is not wrong with America.  Become a citizen first, then you can talk.<br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Cedarbird on Bush has succeeded in spite of democratic obstacles.</title></item><item><author>Basmas</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Well there is the small issue in the first section.&nbsp; Gore was winning in the polls and those polls were corect in so far as he did get more votes.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Innocent people also protest their innocence but without a trial it is rather hard to tell who is guilty and who&nbsp; isn't.</p>
<p>Tell me would you support the US lauching a missile attack on the UK to kill somebody they thought was a terroist but were unable to prove it?&nbsp;</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315532</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Basmas on Bush has succeeded in spite of democratic obstacles.</title></item><item><author>killa_chain</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</comments><description><![CDATA[Yea easy target. But it was also unexpected. Ah well, don't mean to derail. ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>killa_chain on Is America Safe? Obama wants to return to a pre 9/11 mentality.</title></item><item><author>Basmas</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Easy target.</p>
<p>Most of the victims were not Indonesians and the bar was popular with tourists from the 'westen' world and of the contries who lost most people three out of the top four were members of the Coalition of the willing.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Basmas on Is America Safe? Obama wants to return to a pre 9/11 mentality.</title></item><item><author>killa_chain</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote"> the Austrialians in the Bali Bomb, </div><br/><br/>This was a dark day in Indonesia... I almost went to Bali for a holiday when the second bomb hit. I seriously don't get why Indonesia was a chosen place when most of the population is Muslim.<br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>killa_chain on Is America Safe? Obama wants to return to a pre 9/11 mentality.</title></item><item><author>Basmas</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</comments><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;">Apart from the fact that if the USA pissess of the Islamic world it will do nothing but increase in rate that terrorists are 'created'.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;">Attacking a series of Islamic countries and constanly threating others is hardly the best way of calming down an already inflamed and sensetive region(s) of the world.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: small;">Attacking the country that did harbour the people who attacked you was one thing, attacking another (who were not under the <span style="font-size: small; font-family: Book Antiqua;">tyranny of Osama) annoyed vast numbers across the world and different types of people.&nbsp;&nbsp; Over 750 000&nbsp; marched against the war in London, your major ally in this war and the London tube bombers directly cited the Iraq war as a reason for their actions.&nbsp; If that happens in the UK try to image what happens in other parts of the world.&nbsp; Until recently the targets of the major attacks in the world (Spain, the Austrialians in the Bali Bomb, the UK) were all contries that sent troops into Iraq.</span></span></p>
<p>Acting like you have a god given right to do what you want to whom you want when you want with no regard for anything or anybody else will just increase the world's view of the USA as a bully nation.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/315380</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Basmas on Is America Safe? Obama wants to return to a pre 9/11 mentality.</title></item><item><author>Paladin77</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/303759</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Bush/Cheney are the CEO administration and they prove what an utter failure that theory of government is.</div><br/><br/>Could you explain what you mean?]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/303759</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/303759</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Paladin77 on Barak unqualified to be CEO of the United States of America.</title></item><item><author>kpominville</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/303759</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest mistakes Americans have made in recent years is confusing government with business. They are totally different and should not be run the same.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Bush/Cheney are the CEO administration and they prove what an utter failure that theory of government is.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/303759</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/303759</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>kpominville on Barak unqualified to be CEO of the United States of America.</title></item><item><author>Smoothseas</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</comments><description><![CDATA[The post is totally unreadable but probably not worthy of reading anyhow. kudos to Geiiga's reply tho.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Smoothseas on Overview and analysis of Obama’s policies.</title></item><item><author>Smoothseas</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314289</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Does the unemployment rate include graduates looking for first time employment? No....U can't collect unemployment benefits if u haven't been been laid off from prior employment and that figure is calculated from states reporting the number of people collecting unemployment benefits...So it looks like the Pres tried to twist the truth a bit and you fell for it.&nbsp; The economy is a mess for many and it is not because individuals refuse to adapt to globalization. It is because the government is moving business into globalization without also helping the workforce move with it. The current administration stresses the GDP but what you are not listening to is that 99% of the wealth generated from the GDP growth is going to 1% of the population. Add to that the fact that much of that wealth is being invested in foreign markets and commodity markets instead of our own markets, in particular domestic business that creates domestic jobs that actually benefit the US as a whole. Simply look at food and oil prices.&nbsp; When u look forward there are potential problems that will lead lead to global food and oil shortages if these problems arent dealt with.&nbsp; But the shortages are not actually here yet and can be at least partly avoided.&nbsp; The "perceived" food and oil shortages are in fact not due to actual current shortages but due to the fact that commodity markets have inflated their price through excessive speculation. My point in this is that much of the wealth being created in the current economic environment is being invested in ways which are actually hurting the economy and if US tax policy isnt changed to push investments back into long term investments which create domestic jobs and into investments for alternative energy to decrease the trade imbalance (which is mostly due to our dependence on foreign oil) then our economy will soon resemble that of the Great Depression. <br /></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314289</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314289</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Smoothseas on Liberals trying to scare people with negative jobless key words.</title></item><item><author>timothy_sfker</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314586</comments><description><![CDATA[If anything, your posts have made me come to like Obama even more! It reminds me of that saying, "if they hate you, you must be doing something right."]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314586</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314586</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>timothy_sfker on Obama panhandles for votes by patronizing the poor.</title></item><item><author>Leauki</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Why, oh why post in that horrible unreadable font again???</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Leauki on Overview and analysis of Obama’s policies.</title></item><item><author>timothy_sfker</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</comments><description><![CDATA[I ignored Jesse's post but thoroughly enjoyed Geiiga's reply. Nice work!]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>timothy_sfker on Overview and analysis of Obama’s policies.</title></item><item><author>SanChonino</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</comments><description><![CDATA[Geiiga - admirable work, but Jesus Lopez-Ledesma isn't worth your time or effort.<br/><br/>Do post again, though!  Just not on this tool's blag.<br/><br/>Jesse - I think you want to have buttsex with Obama, don't you?  Do you like the hard-on he must give you?  You sure obsess over him enough.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>SanChonino on Overview and analysis of Obama’s policies.</title></item><item><author>Geiiga</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</comments><description><![CDATA[You say a lot of things, and it's based on an assumption of America as a nation, as Rush Limbaugh likes to say, of 'rugged individualism.' Of pulling yourself up by your bootstraps. This has never, in the history of the world, worked. But I'll happily go through, point by point here. We are a nation of barnraisers. A nation of communities working together to build a better tomorrow.<br/><br/>Poin 1: "The rich fuel the American economy.  They invest, build, and start businesses.  Taxing them will reduce investment capital and reduce the incentive to generate more wealth."<br/><br/>The rich have never driven the American economy anywhere but into the ground. The laissez faire capitalism model that has been in play since Reagan started to dismantle FDR's policy has failed everywhere it's been tried. In the US, this was known in the late 19th century and first part of the 20th as the Robber Baron era. It led to frequent crashes as bubbles formed and popped, culminating in the 1929 event that, oddly enough, started with a real estate crisis in Florida.<br/><br/>Since the New Deal, the American economy has been powered, not by the wealthy, but by the middle class. There will always be industrialists and entrepreneurs, but they don't do this out of any kind of generosity. The supply side economics model here presumes that by giving a millionaire a lot of money, he'll for some reason want to use that money to build stuff that helps other people. This is ridiculous, and akin to thinking if you built a factory that makes useless purple plastic things, then people will want to buy useless purple plastic things.<br/><br/>If, on the other hand, there's less incentive to keep this money, like, for instance, taxing them, then they will pump that money back into the economy as a tax dodge. In 1973, the top marginal tax rate was 70%. If cutting taxes on the wealthy really did power the economy, we'd see real wages increasing, instead of being basically stagnant since 1973. This is very interesting, given that this is based on faulty inflation numbers.<br/><br/>#2 No one puts a gun to any ones head and forces them to open credit accounts and max out their credit cards buying stuff they do not need and/or cannot afford.<br/><br/>This is part 2 of economic misconceptions 101. We now have a bankruptcy bill that was actually written by the credit card companies in order to enhance their bottom line. They are able to charge interest rates up to 30% and put fine print in their contracts that allow them to raise the rate at any time for any reason. At this point they should just be honest with themselves and call it a vig. Combine that with the falling value of the dollar, stagnant wages, and rapidly increasing costs and you've got a recipe for absolutely wiping out the middle class. And that's no good for anybody. Furthermore these companies use predatory practices and target college students who don't know any better.<br/><br/>#3. As far as education is concerned, every child is owed a decent education system.  <br/><br/>Absolutely correct. But your theory is that the money put into is good after bad. You're partially right. Our education system is messed up, but taking money out of the system isn't going to help. The problem is No Child Left Behind has taken an already crippled system out behind the woodshed and given it a bullet. What needs to happen is a complete overhaul of the system, but if you've got an idea to do that that doesn't cost a boatload of money, I'm all ears. I think one of the problems with America is that we are utterly convinced that we have a monopoly on good ideas.<br/><br/>But, as it turns out, private schools don't do any better than the public ones. The best way to improve our educational standing is, believe it or not, to reduce poverty. Children without a parent invested strongly in them don't fare as well, and parents that have to work two or three jobs have trouble finding the time to become invested in their children's education.<br/><br/>#4. I have no problem with the production of alternative fuels as long as it done by private industry for the sale to private citizens.  <br/><br/>Private industry is fine, but the energy business is done by an ever-decreasing number of huge conglomerations. Right now oil is as expensive as it's ever been, and gas prices have more than tripled since Bush took office. What this means for the oil business is record profits. We don't have a choice but to buy their product. The laws of supply and demand stop working when demand is inelastic. Development of alternative energy is an incredibly massive, expensive project that maybe someday some company will do, but they're not in any particular hurry. Plus I don't want them to hold the patent on it, because then we're in the same situation we're in now.<br/><br/>#5. Government only knows how to waste and mismanage.  <br/><br/>While that's true for, say, the military, I'd rather pay a thousand bureaucrats fifty thousand a year than pay one CEO fifty million. Taking the health care industry as an example, Medicare has an overhead of 2.1%. For every hundred dollars that Medicare taxes in, only $2.10 goes to administrative costs. Using numbers cooked up by a right-wing think tank figuring in costs to providers for compliance, that figure rises to 5.2%. UnitedHealth, one of the country's largest insurance providers, spent $21.80 of their money on overhead in 2005. This doesn't include their profits, which were up 18% over 2004. That means that for every hundred dollars that UnitedHealth brought in in 2005, twenty-seven dollars went somewhere other than health care. And that doesn't count what it cost doctors to comply with their paperwork. I'd say the government agency runs a bit tighter ship here than the private company, wouldn't you agree? Government doesn't pay its CEO millions of dollars. The director of Medicare makes a little under $150,000 and does not have a private jet with a gold-plated bathroom.<br/><br/>#6 Every state should be on top of managing the roads and bridges in their area.<br/><br/>Federal highway money is primarily spent on the Federal Interstate Highway System. Note the word Federal in there. And I swear to God, making sure that our roads and bridges are safe is probably the most obvious of federal duties, especially when it's right there in the name of the system. Moreover, it's a commerce situation: if Oklahoma doesn't maintain their highways, makes it awfully difficult for somebody from Kansas to deliver something to somebody in Oklahoma. At any rate, this money is taken from the federal gas tax, which means you're truly paying for what you use.<br/><br/>#7. "Now, see if you can follow this line of reasoning Mr. Obama.  The more oil companies make the more taxes they pay.  Therefore, just by making more money oil companies pay more taxes.  Increase tax rates and American companies will lead a mass exodus to Europe. <br/><br/>In addition, you cannot just force them to stay here.  This is not a communist nation.  There is no reason for any company to stay in the US if Obama and company are just going to tax them to death.  Moreover, make companies leave and you will be responsible for the jobs lost.  It is better to let free market economy alone and deal fairly with everyone."<br/><br/>The myth of the free market economy is one of the sadder economic myths foisted upon us by Dr. Friedman. If lack of government intervention was actually good for the economy, then postwar Iraq, which was built on Friedman's policies, would be the fastest growing economy in the world. It has no import tariffs, nor minimum wage laws, nor is there such a thing as an 'illegal immigrant.' But what we find is kidnapped Bangladeshis working basically as slaves, which is perfectly legal due to the lack of labor laws.<br/><br/>Despite the fact that the American economy is failing due to the disastrous policies of supply side economics, it is still the most powerful economic force in the world. The force of government can be used to keep companies from offshoring either their headquarters or their labor. Import tariffs combined with tax incentives for hiring Americans would resolve this supposed problem somewhat easily, but it's not used because it does not fit into the ideology of the free market.<br/><br/>This is where the myth breaks down: the institutions of government are what make the market possible. The courts that enforce contracts, the police that enforce the law, the bureaucrats who ensure that when I go buy ground beef I'm not getting ground cat. You take these protections away and the marketplace goes with it. A real plan to reduce oil prices starts with a windfall profits tax; that is to say that there is no incentive for these companies to make such insane profit. Of course, a bigger part of the high price of fuel is due to speculators taking advantage of a trading loophole that was actually written by Enron, driving up the cost of a barrel of oil between 25-50%. <br/><br/>#8. Now, health crisis are serious issues and do cost people a lot of money.  However, we all know that medical complications can arise in life and we should factor that in our plans for life.  At some point we are going to have to be real about the demands of life and plan accordingly.  In addition, there is no excuse for letting insurgence expire by not making payments on time.  What are we children?<br/><br/>I've checked around. An insurance policy for me, a young man in good health, costs $12,000 a year. If my mother was to suddenly lose her job and her health insurance with it, it would cost her around $48,000 a year, which is more than she currently makes at her job, which obviously she would no longer have. Plus this insurance that she was forced into buying that she can't afford wouldn't cover her many pre-existing conditions, so I suppose she wouldn't live long enough to become a drain on our libertopia.<br/><br/>The federal poverty line in the United States is $10,400 a year for one person. Clearly, if you're making that much, you can't afford to buy a house. In Topeka, Kansas, the fourth cheapest real estate market in the United States, a one-bedroom apartment in a lousy neighborhood will run you $300 a month, or $3600 a year. Figure in various bills you have to pay just to survive, you're up to $6000 a year. Let's figure you eat on the cheap. Three meals of ramen a day. You die of malnutrition within the year, but it still costs you $400 a year. So you've got $4000 left, which gets you a third of the way to getting an insurance policy just for yourself, and you're going to need it the way you're living.<br/><br/>#9 I’ll ask this again.  How can people with cell phones, Internet, and cable or satellite TV say they cannot afford insurance?  Seems to me like many people in America have their priorities screwed up. <br/><br/>My cell phone, internet, cable bills run me $800 a year. So, if I cut out all of them, I'd be just $11,200 short of an insurance policy that would cover me if I got sick IF THEY FELT LIKE PAYING FOR IT. This isn't liability-only insurance on an old beater of a car, this is expensive stuff. And God help you if you lose your job, because then you're totally screwed.<br/><br/>#10 On the other hand college is an opportunity and not a “right”.  No one owes you a college degree.  It is beneficial to America to have college graduates.  However, at this time there are actually more college graduates in the job the market then the market can support.  Therefore, there is no shortage of college graduates and no reason for government to over spend on helping college students.  Do what most of us have done to get a college degree and pay for it.  Get a job.<br/><br/>"Get a job." Thanks. So I'm making $10,400 a year, I've got $4000 left, I'm dying of malnutrition, and I'm trying to get myself through college. Well, my tuition is $2100 a semester. $4200 a year. Oh, and I have to buy $700 worth of books for that year if I manage to get really good deals on them. But, oh wait, that $300 apartment I got is ten miles from campus, so now I need a car. And to pay for gas. So, I've got to put stuff on my credit card, which builds up at 30% interest, and soon I'm going bankrupt, but that's no help because I still have to pay it back.0<br/><br/>#11. Now to Mr. Obama’s peace dividend after he supposedly brings the troops home from Iraq.  Take a walk down to the White House and ask how the war is being funded.  America is borrowing greatly from China to fund the war.  Are you telling the people of America, Mr Obama that you plan to borrow America in to debt in order to turn over the country to the 15 percent that cannot get their lives in order?<br/><br/>This is called "long term planning." You spend $15 billion a month in Iraq, all you've done is spend $15 billion a month in Iraq. You spend $15 billion on infrastructure and building for the future like education, health care, roads and bridges, you make that money back many times over. Also you don't wind up in Dickensian England, which is a nice plus. <br/><br/>#12 Today, it is necessary to borrow a little to pacify Iraq.  However, America’s plans in Iraq should be short term.  Otherwise, borrowing will cripple the nation.<br/><br/>This is absolutely true. We're spending all these trillions of dollars, essentially throwing them down a rat hole, while our own country is falling apart and our economy is crashing around us. The fact that unemployment is up 10% from last month (!) and is an underreported number anyway (if you're out of work for six months, even if you're looking for a job, you're not unemployed. If you're a particle physicist working at Starbuck's, you're not unemployed).<br/><br/>Where we are now, teetering on the brink of a massive recession unlike any we've seen in 80 years, is where we were going anyway. We have failed to invest in America, and our policies have served to promote the wealthy at the expense of the poor. However, throwing money away on a war we should never have gotten into has accelerated the process to the point where it may be too late. John McCain wants to keep these failed policies in place. At this point I'd be willing to vote for a candidate that promises a revolution of the proletariat to prevent that from taking place. Thankfully, instead, we have a Democrat in the mold of FDR that will take common sense measures to restore our broken government.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314508</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Geiiga on Overview and analysis of Obama’s policies.</title></item><item><author>Sodaiho</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314289</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Here's the truth.&nbsp; Only an idiot would vote for a conservative in the coming election.&nbsp; We can't afford another term of corporate girlfriends.</p>
<p>Quoted from CNN:</p>
<div class="inStoryHeading">Pain at the pump</div>
<p>The national average price for a gallon of gasoline rose above $4.02, motorist group AAA reported Monday. Gas prices reached the $4 milestone for the first time Sunday following Friday's staggering $10.75 jump in the price of a barrel of oil.</p>
<p>The average price is $4 a gallon or more in 22 states and the District of Columbia, according to AAA.</p>
<p>What's more, gasoline prices in the survey have risen for 32 of the past 34 days, setting records on 30 of those days.</p>
<p>As gas prices rise, demand for large, low mileage vehicles has fallen and some of the nation's largest automakers have been hit hard.</p>
<p>General Motors (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=GM&amp;source=story_quote_link"><span style="color: #004276;">GM</span></a>, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/175.html?source=story_f500_link"><span style="color: #004276;">Fortune 500</span></a>) announced plans last week to shut four truck and SUV plants and said it would ramp up producing more fuel-efficient cars. Ford (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=F&amp;source=story_quote_link"><span style="color: #004276;">F</span></a>, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/160.html?source=story_f500_link"><span style="color: #004276;">Fortune 500</span></a>) also recently said it would trim production of large trucks and roll out more small cars and crossovers.</p>
<div class="inStoryHeading">Housing, job woes</div>
<p>In addition to high gas prices, the slump in the housing market is also contributing to Americans' negative view of the economy.</p>
<p>Last month, a key measure of U.S. home prices in the first quarter fell at the sharpest rate in two decades. Standard &amp; Poor's/Case-Shiller's national home price index fell 14.1% in the first quarter compared with a year earlier - its lowest level since its inception in 1988.</p>
<p>The economy is also challenged by a job market that appears to be shrinking.</p>
<p>Last week, the Labor Department reported that the nation's unemployment rate soared to 5.5% in May from 5% in April. It was the biggest jump in the unemployment rate since 1986 and much higher than economists had forecast.</p>
<div class="inStoryHeading">Wall Street turmoil</div>
<p>On Wall Street, credit has become scarce as investors are reluctant to take risks amid the shaky economy. As a result, many major investment firms have reported steep losses.</p>
<p>Lehman Brothers (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=LEH&amp;source=story_quote_link"><span style="color: #004276;">LEH</span></a>, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/10312.html?source=story_f500_link"><span style="color: #004276;">Fortune 500</span></a>) said Monday it will book a $2.8 billion second quarter<a href="http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/2008/06/09/news/companies/lehman_results/index.htm?postversion=2008060909"><span style="color: #004276;">loss</span></a> and announced plans to raise $6 billion in fresh capital by selling stock.</p>
<p>The brokerage blamed writedowns, trading losses and failed attempts to hedge its position for the loss, which was its first since the firm went public in 1994.</p>
<p>The nation's economic woes have led many economists to believe the country slid into a recession last year, although a consensus has not been reached.</p>
<p>The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released in May found that 79% of respondents - nearly 4 out of 5 - believe the economy is in recession. That measure was up from 74% in March, 66% in February and 46% just a half-year back.&nbsp;<a href="http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314289/#TOP"><img onload="if(Sd.ImageResizer) Sd.ImageResizer.createOn(this);" src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/money/images/bug.gif" border="0" alt="To top of page" width="7" height="7" /></a></p>
<div class="storytimestamp">First Published: June 9, 2008: 6:45 AM EDT</div>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314289</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314289</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>Sodaiho on Liberals trying to scare people with negative jobless key words.</title></item><item><author>timothy_sfker</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314344</comments><description><![CDATA[<font color="#9ACD32"><U><I><B><font size="7"><font face="Impact">CHANGE YOUR FONT</font></font></B></I></U></font><br/><br/>please...]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314344</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314344</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>timothy_sfker on Obama, cult of personality</title></item><item><author>erathoniel</author><comments>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314344</comments><description><![CDATA[Obama's just goin' on popularity 'cause he's so deficient in actual politics.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314344</guid><link>http://jesseledesma.joeuser.com/article/314344</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:55:50 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-07-04T02:55:50</pubDateParsed><title>erathoniel on Obama, cult of personality</title></item></channel></rss>