opinion pages and articles on the beauty of life: friendship, family, love, romance, marriage, parenting, etc...
“From the frying pan in to the fire”.

Doesn’t it sometimes seen that way? The Iraqis start taking responsibility for their security, which is what is necessary for violence in Iraq to end and Iran and North Korea start to act up.

Not to mention Palestine militants take an Israeli soldier hostage and Israel invades Palestine.

Of course, the big question here is who is right and who is wrong. The truth is I can follow the money and see how American private investors interfere and destabilize other nations, which in turn leads to violent resistance against the American government and American citizens.

Today I heard the president speak at a news conference in Chicago. Part of his answers to the reporters involved free trade and foreign investment. The president said he in favor of free trade.

Now, free trade sounds good in principal. However, to many people want American money but they do not want American companies.

My simple analysis of Kim Jung Mentally Ill is that he is trying to extort money from the American government. To me, he is saying “give me money or I may do something bad”.

Iran on the other hand just has a lunatic for a leader.

Either way in which way do you decide who has the moral justification for their actions. Americans may donate money to one candidate in a foreign land in order to be able to conduct business more easily.

Does this mean people who Americans do not want to conduct business with can resort to suicide bombings, terrorism, nuclear threat, or extortion?

I say no.

My diplomacy with crazy people would be simple. I would tell them, “If ever you or anything you have created harms Americans, nuclear fire will rain down on you”.

By now every ones knows I will not criticize President Bush.

I would say that Mr. Ill Kim knows that if he harms America in any way he will pay dearly.

Therefore, I do not see why the news media is foaming at the mouth because Mr. Bush will not invade North Korea.

It would be impossible to find a poorer military regime then North Korea. Eventually it will run out of what little money it does have. I wonder what Mr. Ill Kim will do when his people start knocking down his door looking for food.

Because North Korea has long-range missiles and nuclear war heads it is a great threat to the US of A.

Since Mr. Psychosis goal is to get money from the US I do not believe he will jeopardize his objective by completely angering the American government.

My greatest fear is that when North Korea falls from chaos terrorist seize nuclear material from North Korea.

Another fear is that out of desperation for money Ill Kim sells nuclear material to terrorist.

I would say that if nuclear material in North Korea becomes unsecured then the US has the moral justification to eliminate North Korea with whatever means necessary, including nuclear annihilation.

Comments
on Jul 08, 2006
Therefore, I do not see why the news media is foaming at the mouth because Mr. Bush will not invade North Korea.


Because no matter what President Bush does, in the eyes of the main stream media it's wrong. It's guaranteed not to be what a Democrat, any Democrat, would have done. Or at least they believe.

If President Bush walked outside today and said the sky is blue, they'd criticize him for that. Whatever he says, it has to be wrong, and has to be leading this country (the U.S.A.) down the wrong path.

Hopefully President Bush will be replaced with someone that continues many of his policies and keeps things going in the same direction. If so, it's possible that many in the left and in the main stream media will commit hari kari and save us all the trouble of ever having to hear their whines.
on Jul 08, 2006
Rain that nuclear fire down, babyyyyy!!

Actually, I agree with you entirely. That's what should be done, and not only in Korea. It astounds me that America is the only nation on earth, in the history of human civilization, to conquer nations and peoples - and then give back everything it's taken, and more.

Why are you people so obsessed with being the nice guys? After WW2 I'd have nuked everyone I thought could conceivably be a threat to American domination, then or in the future. There never would have been a 'communist threat' because I'd have nuked Moscow the second after Europe had been wrapped up. Moscow, and the Red Army wherever it was found. There would have been no threat from China because I'd have obliterated its major cities immediately after their first successful test of a nuclear weapon.

And I would have been doing, though on a different scale and with weapons immeasurably more destructive, what every conquering power has done sivce the dawn of time: destroy, pillage, rule. Make sure through convincing demonstration that everyone knows you're the baddest bastard on the block.

Not to be, of course. And look at the mess we're in now because of it. Bush should certainly be impeached - but not for war crimes. He should be impeached for his utter and total incompetence as Commander-in-Chief, and because of his cronyism and favor of big business at the expense of every other part of this country. And then we should nuke North Korea - just to make a point.
on Jul 08, 2006
Rain that nuclear fire down, babyyyyy!!

Why don't we have you in the UN?