opinion pages and articles on the beauty of life: friendship, family, love, romance, marriage, parenting, etc...
Christians, Bush, Iraq
Published on September 28, 2007 By jesseledesma In Politics
On this review of McCain’s’ profile I reviewed his biography, criticisms of him, and his values. The one big problem for me is that in my opinion McCain has been a political opportunist by attacking president Bush.

I have said before an enemy of Bush is an enemy of mine. However, I will play fair and list some facts here for the reader’s review.
McCain’s criticisms of Christian’s leader also does not sit well with me.

However, I will say that if the choice is between McCain and any democrat, I will seat and bleed to get McCain elected.

The following biographical information was taken by me from The New York Times web page which has the date of Friday September, 2007.
Biography
Full Name: John Sidney McCain III
Party: Republican
Political Office: U.S. Senator from Arizona, elected 1986; reelected 1992, 1998, 2004; U.S. Representative from AZ, 1983-1987
Military Service: Pilot, U.S. Navy 1958-1981, retiring as captain; POW in Vietnam, 1967-1973
Date of Birth: August 29, 1936
Place of Birth: Panama Canal Zone
Education: B.S., United States Naval Academy, 1958; grad., the National War College, 1974
Spouse: married (2d) Cindy Hensley, 1980
Children: adopted sons Douglas and Andrew of first wife, Carol (m. 1965; div. 1980); daughter Sidney (with wife Carol), born 1980; daughters Meghan and Bridget (born and adopted, 1991); sons John IV and James
Religion: Episcopalian
Home: Phoenix, AZ
Campaign Web Site: www.johnmccain.com

The following notes were also taken from the same web page named above.

“Mr. McCain, who was elected to the House in 1982 and the Senate in 1986, has emerged as the Republican field's strongest proponent of an aggressive approach to the Iraq war and of Mr. Bush's decision in January to deploy more soldiers, primarily in Baghdad.”

The following quotes come from McCain’s web site (http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/).

Government Spending, Lower Taxes and Economic Prosperity
America's economic progress requires that the federal government abide by the same standards of common sense and fiscal restraint as hardworking families. Read More

Human Dignity & the Sanctity of Life
During more than five years as a POW in Vietnam, John McCain experienced the worst assaults on human dignity imaginable. Yet each day he also saw in his fellow prisoners the power of human compassion and the will to prevail against unimaginable evil. It is this experience, and a life dedicated to public service, that has imbued in John McCain a fundamental commitment to the protection of human dignity that will shape his presidency. Read More

Lobbying & Ethics Reform
John McCain believes that a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people" must remain ever faithful to that noble charge. America needs leadership devoted to the public interest, not the special interest, and a government that fulfills its duties with unfailing integrity, accountability, and common sense. Those who serve in positions of public trust have a patriotic duty to serve the national interest with integrity and accountability, to conduct ourselves in a manner worthy of the people we are privileged to serve, and to devote ourselves to America's agenda, not that of narrow special interests. Read More

Strategy for Victory in Iraq
John McCain believes that we must not fail in Iraq. Succeeding in the cause of helping the Iraqi people build a stable, secure, representative state is essential to achieving an enduring peace in a region of the world central to American prosperity and national security. Failure in Iraq will endanger America for generations to come. America has a vital interest in a secure, democratic Iraq, at peace with its neighbors, to help stabilize a dangerous and critical region. Read More

Border Security & Immigration Reform
I have always believed that our border must be secure and that the federal government has utterly failed in its responsibility to ensure that it is secure. If we have learned anything from the recent immigration debate, it is that Americans have little trust that their government will honor a pledge to do the things necessary to make the border secure. Read More

Commitment To America's Service Members: Past And Present
America owes its liberty, its prosperity, and its future to our veterans who have dedicated their lives to protecting our great country. John McCain has fought to honor our national commitment to our veterans who have given their careers and livelihoods to ensuring our freedom. He believes we must provide for service members and their families while they serve, we must help those who return from combat to adjust to civilian life, and we must honor and never forget the service of those who do not return. Read More

National Security
The most sacred responsibility vested in a president - the commander in chief - is to "preserve and protect" American citizens. John McCain has the necessary vision and unrivaled experience to command the United States armed forces and adapt our nation's defenses to the demands of a changing and dangerous world. Read More

Stewards of Our Nation's Rich Natural Heritage
John McCain has a proud record of common sense stewardship. Along with his commitment to clean air and water, and to conserving open space, he has been a leader on the issue of global warming with the courage to call the nation to action on an issue we can no longer afford to ignore. Read More

Protecting Second Amendment Rights
John McCain believes that the right of law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is a fundamental, individual Constitutional right that we have a sacred duty to protect. We have a responsibility to ensure that criminals who violate the law are prosecuted to the fullest, rather than restricting the rights of law abiding citizens. Gun control is a proven failure in fighting crime. Law abiding citizens should not be asked to give up their rights because of criminals - criminals who ignore gun control laws anyway.

The following quotes were taken from an MSNBC web page (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17146257/)

The Republican presidential hopeful is working hard to repair relations with conservative Christian activists, whose support could be critical to winning the GOP nomination. But they remain skeptical that he sincerely shares their values.

While McCain has managed to pry open some of the doors that slammed shut in his rift with the right during his bid for the presidency in 2000, conservatives' list of grievances against the Arizona senator is substantial:

-They are dubious about his opposition to a federal amendment to ban gay marriage. McCain opposes same-sex marriage, but says it should be regulated by the states.

-They still resent passages in the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, which Christian broadcasters say limit what they can tell voters before elections.

-And they question the sincerity of his overtures. McCain condemned evangelist leaders Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell as "agents of intolerance" during his 2000 run.



Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Sep 28, 2007
McCain condemned evangelist leaders Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell as "agents of intolerance" during his 2000 run.



Most apt statement to ever come out of the man's mouth. Those are about the nicest words I've got for those pretenders.

They still resent passages in the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, which Christian broadcasters say limit what they can tell voters before elections.


Yeah, heaven forbid we actually try to control kickbacks from those crooks . . . er, I mean "evangelists". Yeah. They're just in it for God and all that.

Basically, you just made me like the man all the more, Jesus. I'd like him even more if he'd spit in their faces.
on Sep 29, 2007
McCain claims he believes in "Government of the People".

HOW can he continue to support a war that the vast majority of Americans DO NOT SUPPORT?

How can he support an immigration policy that the VAST majority of Americans DO NOT SUPPORT?

McCain, like Bush, agree in Democracy so long as the choices made by the majority agree with what they want!
on Sep 29, 2007
HOW can he continue to support a war that the vast majority of Americans DO NOT SUPPORT?

How can he support an immigration policy that the VAST majority of Americans DO NOT SUPPORT?



how can the democrats support these things too.
on Sep 29, 2007
"How can the democrats support these things too."

The Democrats want the Iraq War to END like MOST Americans.

I believe anyone that wants to grant amnesty to people that have broken our laws is WRONG no matter who they are or which party they belong to!
on Sep 29, 2007
I believe anyone that wants to grant amnesty to people that have broken our laws is WRONG no matter who they are or which party they belong to!


then how come the only ones you ever attack are the republicans.
on Sep 29, 2007
If the majority of Americans really wanted the war with Iraq to end, the democrat controled house and democrat controled senate would not have any problem forcing Bush to withdrawl the troops.

Instead, though these demos have tried the real supporters of the Iraq war have flooded their emails, phone banks, and offices with communiques explain why they think the war is necessary.

This pressure has lead to democrats not been able to overturn Bush. Therefore, the premise that most Americans are against the war is wrong.
on Sep 29, 2007
While the president spoke of a long-term commitment to Iraq in his nationally televised address, a time frame longer than two years is not acceptable to most Americans. Still, most of those polled expect large numbers of U.S. troops to remain in Iraq for many years to come.

Sixty-eight percent of Americans say that U.S. troop levels in Iraq should either be reduced or that all troops should be removed - similar numbers to those before Mr. Bush's speech.


Umm . . . sixty-eight percent is a majority, Jesus. Learn to do math.

Link, stupid.
on Sep 30, 2007
a time frame longer than two years is not acceptable to most Americans.


on Sep 30, 2007
Ok, so again why, if your premise is that 68% want the troops out can't Pelozi, Reed, And Hillary get the president to bring the troops home.

I would suggest because Americans really supoort the war and poll results are the yeild of "engineered questions".

See if you want to win an election you do what the majority want. Your majority is against the war. Seens to me the rational thing for the politicians to do is listen to the majority.

After all with the right numbers, congress can overturn a presidential veto. Yet that has not happened.
on Sep 30, 2007
a time frame longer than two years is not acceptable to most Americans. Still, most of those polled expect large numbers of U.S. troops to remain in Iraq for many years to come.



you people really need to start reading what is posted. this polls says that most want to stay but not for more than two years.

on Sep 30, 2007

then how come the only ones you ever attack are the republicans.

I just did-- "I believe anyone that wants to grant amnesty to people that have broken our laws is WRONG no matter who they are or which party they belong to!"
on Sep 30, 2007
I just did-- "I believe anyone that wants to grant amnesty to people that have broken our laws is WRONG no matter who they are or which party they belong to!"


no you have not attacked the democrats. you are just trying to make it seem like you have.


it doesn't count as an attack until you do it on your own. and not parrot someone else in this case me.
on Sep 30, 2007
jesseledesmaSeptember 29, 2007 19:14:57Reply #6
If the majority of Americans really wanted the war with Iraq to end, the democrat controlled house and democrat controlled senate would not have any problem forcing Bush to withdraw the troops.

Today that is not correct. It takes 60 votes in the Senate to even vote on a bill and if the president uses his veto, it requires 2/3 in BOTH Houses to override his veto. That is 67 Votes in the SENATE and I believe 219 in the house. The Democrats DO NOT have that many votes so long as the GOP members of Congress continue to support the failed policies of Bush. Until we have a President that does not veto bills that allow the changes people want, we need a Congress that will act. In 2008 the voters need to understand the reason WHY their will has not been followed is because of the GOP members in Congress have prevented those changes from taking place!
on Sep 30, 2007
then how come the only ones you ever attack are the republicans.


how come the only ones you ever attack are the liberals?

If the majority of Americans really wanted the war with Iraq to end, the democrat controled house and democrat controled senate would not have any problem forcing Bush to withdrawl the troops.


since Bush can veto anything the congress agrees on, it doesn't work that way. And there is not ennough majority for a fillibuster-breaker, or a veto-breaker.
on Sep 30, 2007
how come the only ones you ever attack are the liberals?


you need to read more of my stuff.

have stated several times that bush has done somethings wrong. and the democrats have a few things right(very few)

since Bush can veto anything the congress agrees on, it doesn't work that way. And there is not ennough majority for a fillibuster-breaker, or a veto-breaker.


which only proves that the majority of the people don't want what gene says they want. or 1 they wouldn't have revoted for bush. 2 made it so that there wasn't a real majority in the senate.
2 Pages1 2