Program the Nukes and Let Them Fly.
Earlier I was thinking that the reason I am not all that motivated to write is because there are no major battles to wage.
Immigration has been defeated. Bush can confidently claim victory in Iraq. There are no republican scandals claiming the airwaves.
The legal cases and atheist actions against Christians are minimal.
I have written more on life and the elements of life that I ever wanted to write.
Even in this complicated election cycle I have profiled the candidates. The republican candidates them selves have taken a vacation from politicking.
Life, however, does not stop. The California fires showed me how desperate democrats are to discredit Bush.
I have been and still am a Bush supporter. I consider him part of the Reagan dynasty. After Mr. Bush, there is no one left to carry on the Reagan legacy.
I guess I should explain insider power politics. There is a club of people of the same ideas, wealth, and republican political control.
You are either a member or you are not. This group picks the nominee and funds the activities to get him elected.
The delegates’ only think they choose the nominee.
Reagan, Papa Bush, and Baby Bush are members. I agree with the agenda and have no problem working for the team.
See, outsiders you cannot trust. Giuliani’s worrisome position on abortion is an example why they cannot be trusted.
Insiders follow the party politics until the death. Outsiders try to play by their rules and sometimes compromise the mission.
Now, how does a simple cab driver from El Paso, Texas know about Power Politics? Well I may not be a card-carrying member of the Republican Party. However, I have been part of other power systems.
What I learned there is you always back, support, and protect your captain. Today, Bush would be the captain and I have no trouble in sacrificing myself to protect him.
This is why I write in defense of this president. He has done nothing wrong. He has served America well.
No one in his or her right mind would have guessed that the U.S. would be in this battle between good and evil.
I am glad a strong, disciplined; man of conviction is in the presidency. There is right and wrong. There is good and evil.
When confronted with evil we have two choices. We can run or we can fight. I am glad Bush decided to fight.
If you look at the Iranian leader’s rhetoric, it is the same rhetoric of Arafat and Sadam. I see it as rhetoric used to incite passion in the people over there.
Nothing wrong in willing to die for your beliefs as long as your beliefs have value. Radical Islam has no value.
I say this is going to be the thorn in the paw of the world for the rest of human history.
This is why I say America has to think long term. It is not in the best long-term interest of the U.S. to try to police the world.
If I were in charge, I would try to promote regional policing by the big economies. Russia, the EU, and China can police their areas. There can be conferences of all the regional powers in order to coordinate efforts.
America does not have enough human or money power to police the world. Other nations should take responsibility for tyrants and radicals.
As long as America carries the entire load, other nations will not act. This is not in America’s best interest.
Now lets look at the attitudes of China and Russia. Could it be that they can stick it to the U.S. because America appears to be desperate for a solution.
Now you may say that it is very important for America to prevent North Korea and Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
Well to me it is only important, if you believe these nations would use those weapons. It is a lot easier to poison or infect then it is to bomb with a nuclear weapon.
The residue from a nuclear bomb will lead you right back to the source. Okay, you say, “yeah, but that is only good after a detonation”.
Well let every one know that if an attack by a nuclear weapon happens on American soil, the U.S. will rain nuclear fire on the perpetrators and their supporters.
What did we tell the Russians? “Bomb us and we will bomb you”. I believe it was called “mutually assured destruction”.
Well put that back on the table.
Worst-case scenario is that terrorists detonate five dirty bombs on American soil and over 20 million Americans perish.
If the American security forces cannot prevent five nuclear devices from entering the country, maybe we do not deserve to exist.
Either way let everyone know that we will end all the nations whose citizens participate on an attack on America.
This way you apply internal political pressure on leaders of nations to reconsider their support for terrorism.
Now, you may say this kind of harsh rhetoric may make more enemies of the people of the world for the U.S.
I got news for you. They already hate us. My analysis is that you cannot trust many other nations to do their part.
The people of the world are following the “fog of evil” and giving in to decadent pleasures, which is skewing their perspective.
Where most of us can see the potential threat of terrorism, many other nation’s leaders are only focusing on generating economic growth.
China and Russia want economic growth so bad that they do business with North Korea and Iran, not to mention Cuba.
I never considered North Korea a threat. Iran can only be a threat if the U.S. does not let the Iranian leadership know the consequences of their future terrorist actions.
This leadership needs to know that if people who Iran supports harm America then Iran will seize to exist.
Russia, China, and other nations need to know that if they facilitate or fail to prevent a terrorist attack on America then they will hold the burden for American reprisal.
Furthermore, Iran is an economic partner of Russia and China. Neither Russia nor China will be able to hide behind “we did not know” if Iran does something inadvisable.
I ask, “Why does the second biggest petroleum exporting country need nuclear power?” Iran has enough oil to produce electricity for ages. Are they running out of oil? Maybe they just want to squeeze every drop of money from their oil cache.
Either way Iran’s economic structure is not the U.S.’ problem. If they sell all their oil and need nuclear power to exist, I do not care.
Iranian rhetoric does not impress me either. Rhetoric is only as dangerous as the speaker is willing to act.
I cannot see any country risking being burned in nuclear fire. However, if Iran participates or any other country participates in a terrorist attack on the U.S. then they need to be burned in a nuclear holocaust.
You do not send aircraft to bomb them. You do not send soldiers. You just program the nukes and let them fly.